On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:03:10PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 05:11:42PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> >
> >>platform_get_irq*() cannot return 0 on error as 0 is a valid IRQ on some
> >>platforms, return NO_IRQ (-1) instead.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>--- linux-2.6-working.orig/drivers/base/platform.c 2006-01-05 16:49:23.000000000 +0000
> >>+++ linux-2.6-working/drivers/base/platform.c 2006-01-05 17:10:18.000000000 +0000
> >>@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
> >> {
> >> struct resource *r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num);
> >>
> >>- return r ? r->start : 0;
> >>+ return r ? r->start : NO_IRQ;
> >
> >
> > No, I think the whole NO_IRQ stuff has been given up on, see the lkml
> > archives for details.
>
> Now that you mention it I remember that thread[1].
>
> How about returning -ENXIO (or similar) then?
That would be fine as long as you fix up all callers to not pass that
value to request_irq() :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]