Re: devfs going away, last chance to complain (was Re: [GIT PATCH] Driver Core patches for 2.6.15)

On Thursday 05 January 2006 07:44, Steven Noonan wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but what precisely was/is the problem with devfs,
> anyway?

This has been toasted to death many times. These guys won't waste time 
describing the issues again. Just search the ML archives for devfs, but make 
sure you have several hours to kill ;)

Andrew Walrond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [GIT PATCH] Driver Core patches for 2.6.15
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • devfs going away, last chance to complain (was Re: [GIT PATCH] Driver Core patches for 2.6.15)
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: devfs going away, last chance to complain (was Re: [GIT PATCH] Driver Core patches for 2.6.15)
    • From: Steven Noonan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: (1) ACPI messes up Parallel support in kernels >2.6.9
• Next by Date: Re: devfs going away, last chance to complain (was Re: [GIT PATCH] Driver Core patches for 2.6.15)
• Previous by thread: Re: devfs going away, last chance to complain (was Re: [GIT PATCH] Driver Core patches for 2.6.15)
• Next by thread: Re: devfs going away, last chance to complain (was Re: [GIT PATCH] Driver Core patches for 2.6.15)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]