On Thursday 05 January 2006 11:27, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:12:51AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 January 2006 08:40, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
> > > Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 14:57 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > sounds like we need some sort of profiler or benchmarker or at least
> > > > a tool that helps finding out which timers are regularly firing,
> > > > with the aim at either grouping them or trying to reduce their
> > > > disturbance in some form.
> > >
> > > You mean something like a modification to timer debugging patch to
> > > record the last time the timer fired, right?
> > > Timertop could then detect the pattern and provide frequency, standard
> > > deviation and other statistical data.
> > > It would be much more expensive to test of course.
> >
> > I don't think the timer debugging patch needs to give out any more info.
> > The userspace tool should be able to do this with the amount of info the
> > timer debugging patch is giving already.
>
> In the absense of a pointer to a userspace tool, I found the following
> handy. (It also fixes a bug where it was printing garbage as process
> names).
Timertop and pmstats are here:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/dyn-ticks/
Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
