Matt Helsley wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 11:04 -0800, Jay Lan wrote:
Shailabh Nagar wrote:
<snip>
Index: linux-2.6.15-rc7/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15-rc7.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc7/kernel/exit.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/cn_proc.h>
+#include <linux/cn_stats.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
@@ -865,6 +866,7 @@ fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long co
tsk->exit_code = code;
proc_exit_connector(tsk);
+ cnstats_exit_connector(tsk);
We need to move both proc_exit_connector(tsk) and
cnstats_exit_connector(tsk) up to before exit_mm(tsk) statement.
There are task statistics collected in task->mm and those stats
will be lost after exit_mm(tsk).
Thanks,
- jay
exit_notify(tsk);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
mpol_free(tsk->mempolicy);
-
Good point. The assignment of the task exit code will also have to move
up before exit_mm(tsk) because the process event connector exit function
retrieves the exit code from the task struct.
Why does proc_exit_connector need to move ? It only uses
task->{pid,tgid,exit_code,exit_signal}, none of which
should be affected by exit_mm(), right ?
-- Shailabh
Moving these may also affect the job/pagg/task_notify/cpuset exit
notification if we're eventually going to remove *direct* calls to these
from kernel/exit.c.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]