On Wednesday 04 January 2006 19:53, Nick Warne wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2006 18:34, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 January 2006 17:39, Nick Warne wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 04 January 2006 17:36, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > > > > I went from 2.6.14 -> 2.6.14.2 -> .2-.3 -> .3-.4 -> .4-.5
> > > >
> > > > and how did you do that?
> > > > Noone supplies such incremental patches AFAIK.
> > >
> > > Yes, I got from kernel.org - I am _not_ that clever to devise my own
> > > incremental patches, otherwise I wouldn't be asking stupid questions...
> >
> > Nick's right, both are provided automatically by kernel.org.
>
> Anyway, I started from scratch - 2.6.14, patched to 2.6.15 and then make
> oldconfig etc.
>
> I think there needs to be a way out of this that is easily discernible - it
> does get confusing sometimes with all the patches flying around on a
> 'stable release'.
It's documented in the kernel.
There's something in the kernel.org FAQ there about -rc kernels, but it might
be better to generalise this for stable releases. Added hpa to CC.
--
Cheers,
Alistair.
'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.'
Third year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
