Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, this patch looks ok, if it's confirmed to unbreak apache. Yes, sounds reasonable. But I don't think that, as Peter suggested in another mail, that glibc should automatically wrap the syscall to provide support for larger sizes. The caller probably should know when a transfer was cut short. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Limit sendfile() to 2^31-PAGE_CACHE_SIZE bytes without error
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Limit sendfile() to 2^31-PAGE_CACHE_SIZE bytes without error
- References:
- [PATCH] Limit sendfile() to 2^31-PAGE_CACHE_SIZE bytes without error
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Limit sendfile() to 2^31-PAGE_CACHE_SIZE bytes without error
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Limit sendfile() to 2^31-PAGE_CACHE_SIZE bytes without error
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch
- Next by Date: kernel programming donts
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Limit sendfile() to 2^31-PAGE_CACHE_SIZE bytes without error
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Limit sendfile() to 2^31-PAGE_CACHE_SIZE bytes without error
- Index(es):
 |