Hello all! Hi Jens! I'd be kind if you would cc me in case you reply as I'm not (yet) subscribed to this list. On Mi, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:24:44 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04 2006, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > Can you try and see how, say, track01 differ? Is it single bytes, chunks > > of 2352 bytes, or? > > Oh, and try and disable DMA on the cd driver and repeat your results > with ide-cd. It uses DMA, where ide-scsi does not. Dunno what Windows > does. It could just be a problem with your drive and DMA enabled rips. Hi Jens, I did as you said and disabled dma: /dev/hdc: IO_support = 1 (32-bit) unmaskirq = 1 (on) using_dma = 0 (off) keepsettings = 0 (off) readonly = 0 (off) readahead = 256 (on) HDIO_GETGEO failed: Invalid argument Then I reripped the whole disc. Now this is remarkable. The rip still has errors, but the errors are not only in the same tracks. They are exactly the same errors (md5sums are equal to the ones I yielded from using ide-cd before): e8319ccc20d053557578b9ca3eb368dd track01.cdda.wav (!) cb978f86ddc18c9df1b7e91705380bc5 track02.cdda.wav (!) 35f1b296d72a8708d03aeb540a3b4f30 track03.cdda.wav (!) e82169e5ea1b441b80db96fce12fd109 track04.cdda.wav 8d807b7ac19f90049aec6ff177e9b486 track05.cdda.wav 02561939763d67aacf23157c09966a89 track06.cdda.wav (!) 9724b0a3e2295084613da9df7397ae6d track07.cdda.wav (!) c2d85b3d10428aad66664d0fb3e4c71a track08.cdda.wav (!) 5116b2fae44b8b86fbf40b9bac9a8268 track09.cdda.wav (!) 9e6a5ab2dab76e1677667f586895293a track10.cdda.wav (!) 3792a680b1ba729de9185043d331186f track11.cdda.wav ba534fd8eb42dd84aa7b59ab3ae6f132 track12.cdda.wav d6346ab76696dddf735a5b752aa7888b track13.cdda.wav I used the wav compare function in EAC. 1. wav ripped by EAC #################### What happened? Where? ------------------------------------------------- Different samples 0:04:08.318 - 0:04:08.362 2100 missing samples 0:04:08.359 Different samples 0:04:08.430 - 0:04:08.433 Different samples 0:04:09.348 - 0:04:09.398 2. wav ripped by cdparanoia ########################### What happened? Where? ------------------------------------------------- Different samples 0:04:08.318 - 0:04:08.362 2039 missing samples 0:04:08.414 Different samples 0:04:08.431 - 0:04:08.434 Different samples 0:04:09.349 - 0:04:09.399 I'm sorry if this isn't what you had in mind when you told me to compare the wav files. If it doesn't help what can I do to compare the files to your liking? Sebastian -- "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." (HST)
Attachment:
pgpakEExHrMkb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Digital Audio Extraction with ATAPI drives far from perfect
- From: jerome lacoste <[email protected]>
- Re: Digital Audio Extraction with ATAPI drives far from perfect
- From: Alistair John Strachan <[email protected]>
- Re: Digital Audio Extraction with ATAPI drives far from perfect
- References:
- Digital Audio Extraction with ATAPI drives far from perfect
- From: Sebastian <[email protected]>
- Re: Digital Audio Extraction with ATAPI drives far from perfect
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: Digital Audio Extraction with ATAPI drives far from perfect
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Digital Audio Extraction with ATAPI drives far from perfect
- Prev by Date: About your file..
- Next by Date: Re: [Patch] es7000 broken without acpi
- Previous by thread: Re: Digital Audio Extraction with ATAPI drives far from perfect
- Next by thread: Re: Digital Audio Extraction with ATAPI drives far from perfect
- Index(es):