RE: Latency traces I cannot interpret (sa1100, 2.6.15-rc7-rt1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Daniel Walker
> Ok, yet another patch. This one uses the correct lowlevel calls, and I
> fixed the call ordering.

Hmm, I have no deep knowledge of ARM assembler programming,
but your patch branches to a C subroutine without setting up a
return address in the lr register.

Hence, the return in trace_irqs_... jumps to god-knows-where,
but not back to the next instruction.

As a wild guess, I replaced the "b trace_irqs_..." with
"bl trace_irqs_...".

With this change, the kernel boots fine, but the system seems to go
into an infinite loop as soon as the first usermode processes start.
Most likely, my change messes up the lr register of some surrounding
context.

-- 
Klaus Kusche                 (Software Development - Control Systems)
KEBA AG             Gewerbepark Urfahr, A-4041 Linz, Austria (Europe)
Tel: +43 / 732 / 7090-3120                 Fax: +43 / 732 / 7090-6301
E-Mail: [email protected]                                WWW: www.keba.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux