Re: [PATCH 1/3] Eliminate __attribute__ ((packed)) warnings for gcc-4.1

> > +	__u8 rate		;
> > +	__u8 width		;
> > +	__u8 length		;
> > +	__u8 compression	;
> > +	__u8 ecm		;
> > +	__u8 binary		;
> > +	__u8 scantime		;
> > +	__u8 id[FAXIDLEN]	;
>
>What's with the funky placement of ; ?
>The rest of the struct looks sensible.
>
Looks like a simple s/__attribute__((packed))// rather than
s/\s+__attribute__((packed))/;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Eliminate __attribute__ ((packed)) warnings for gcc-4.1 (whitespace-beautified version)
  - From: Jan Blunck <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Eliminate __attribute__ ((packed)) warnings for gcc-4.1
  - From: Jan Blunck <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 1/3] Eliminate __attribute__ ((packed)) warnings for gcc-4.1
  - From: Jan Blunck <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Eliminate __attribute__ ((packed)) warnings for gcc-4.1
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC]: add sysfs support to parport_pc, v3
Next by Date: Re: Digital Audio Extraction with ATAPI drives far from perfect
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Eliminate __attribute__ ((packed)) warnings for gcc-4.1
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Eliminate __attribute__ ((packed)) warnings for gcc-4.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]