On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:15:49PM -0600, Mark Maule wrote:
> Abstract portions of the MSI core for platforms that do not use standard
> APIC interrupt controllers. This is implemented through a new arch-specific
> msi setup routine, and a set of msi ops which can be set on a per platform
> basis.
...
> +
> + msi_ops->target(vector, dest_cpu, &address_hi, &address_lo);
> +
> + pci_write_config_dword(entry->dev, msi_upper_address_reg(pos),
> + address_hi);
> pci_write_config_dword(entry->dev, msi_lower_address_reg(pos),
> - address.lo_address.value);
> + address_lo);
> set_native_irq_info(irq, cpu_mask);
> break;
> }
...
> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ msi/drivers/pci/msi-apic.c 2005-12-22 11:09:37.022232088 -0600
...
> +struct msi_ops msi_apic_ops = {
> + .setup = msi_setup_apic,
> + .teardown = msi_teardown_apic,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + .target = msi_target_apic,
> +#endif
Mark,
msi_target_apic() initializes address_lo parameter.
Even on a UP machine, we need inialize this value.
If target is called unconditionally, wouldn't it be better
for msi_target_apic() always be called?
It would also be good for msi_target_apic to validate the 'dest_cpu' is online.
Maybe a BUG_ON or something like that.
grant
ps. not done looking through this...and still curious to see where
other discussion about generic vector assignment leads.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
