Re: [patch 0/9] mutex subsystem, -V4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> > How can't you get the fact that semaphores could _never_ be as simple as
> > mutexes?  This is a theoritical impossibility, which maybe turns out not
> > to be so true on x86, but which is damn true on ARM where the fast path
> > (the common case of a mutex) is significantly more efficient.
> >
> I did notice your comments.  I'll grant that mutexes will save some tens  of
> fastpath cycles on one minor architecture.  Sorry, but that doesn't seem
> very important.

Heh !! i can't find words so i will just spell the emotion....
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux