RE: Latency traces I cannot interpret (sa1100, 2.6.15-rc7-rt1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 15:57 +0100, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
>  Ok, yet another patch. This one uses the correct lowlevel calls, and I
> > fixed the call ordering.
> Hmmm, it changes a few flag and register values (e.g. lr),
> but basically it gives the same BUG and Oops.
> As the first BUG is very early: 
> Is it possible that tracing gets called before it is initialized?

Most likely . It's hard to create a global solution in the entry-*.S
files cause the code in there is called so early.  


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux