>It strikes me that it's a bit of a chicken and egg problem. Vendors are still
>releasing applications on Linux that support only OSS, partly due to
>ignorance, but mostly because ALSA's OSS compatibility layer allows them to
>lazily ignore the ALSA API and target all cards, old and new.
>
>Additionally, we can't get rid of OSS compatibility until pretty much all
>hardware has an ALSA driver, and (inferred from your comment) we can't get
>rid of OSS drivers until nothing supports OSS, because the whole of the ALSA
>stuff is a bit larger...
>
By OSS compatibility, do you mean the OSS PCM emulation layer (/dev/dsp)? I
think that should be kept. That way, legacy apps keep working, especially
unmaintained binary-only things like Unreal Tournament 1.
The OSS emulation does not depend on the OSS tree (CONFIG_SOUND_PRIME), so I
cannot quite follow your second paragraph - we should not remove OSS compat.
anytime.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
