Re: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


* Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:

> > have you applied the zlib patches too? In particular this one should 
> > make a difference:
> > 
> >
> > 
> > If you didnt have this applied, could you apply it and retry with 
> > stack-footprint-debugging again?
> Ingo, instead of having a static work area and using locking, why not 
> just move those fields into the "z_stream" structure, and thus make 
> them be per-stream? The z_stream structure should already be allocated 
> with kmalloc() or similar by the caller, so that also gets it off the 
> stack without the locking thing.
> Hmm?

yeah, i'll implement that. The above one was just a quick hack that 
somehow survived. (and i am definitely a wimp when it comes to changing 
zlib internals :-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux