On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:03:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > But what _is_ the best idea? > > Just use `inline'. With gcc-3 it'll be inlined. Where does this certainity come from? gcc-3.x (as well as 2.x) each had its own heuristics which functions should be inlined and which should not. inline keyword has always been a hint. Jakub - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- References:
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Prev by Date: Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Index(es):
![]() |