RE: Latency traces I cannot interpret (sa1100, 2.6.15-rc7-rt1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 15:55 +0100, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
> > From: Daniel Walker
> > Right .. I'm still looking into it. ARM is just missing some vital
> > tracing bits I think .
> 
> As I wrote in some earlier mail, I'm probably the first one ever
> who tried it on ARM: When I tried first, tracing didn't work at all,
> because the trace timing macro's were not defined (at least for
> sa1100). I quick-hacked the three missing macros (this caused the
> tracer to produce at least some output) without checking if 
> anything else is missing.

I'm sure the code has been tested , but I doubt it's ever really been
used .

What macro's are you talking about? Did you submit a patch already to
fix that? If not, please do.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux