RE: Latency traces I cannot interpret (sa1100, 2.6.15-rc7-rt1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 08:57 +0100, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
>   <idle>-0     0D...    1us+: preempt_schedule_irq (svc_preempt)
>   <idle>-0     0....    5us!: default_idle (cpu_idle)
>   <idle>-0     0D..1 8700us+: asm_do_IRQ (c021da48 1a 0)

Your trace appears to be showing an actual latency of 300us . The trace
starts at 8700us . The default_idle line above is showing interrupts are
enable, and preemption is enabled . So the tracing code really should be
ignoring the default_idle line since there is no reason to be tracing. 


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux