Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >         /*
> >          * Tasks that have marked their sleep as noninteractive get
> >          * woken up without updating their sleep average. (i.e. their
> >          * sleep is handled in a priority-neutral manner, no priority
> >          * boost and no penalty.)
> >          */
> >
> > This appears to be the only documentation for the TASK_NONINTERACTIVE
> > flag,

On 12/23/05, Peter Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> I guess it makes to many assumptions about the reader's prior knowledge
> of the scheduler internals.  I'll try to make it clearer.

FWIW, Ingo invented TASK_NONINTERACTIVE to fix a problem I had with
Wine. See the following threads for further discussion:

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux