Kurt Wall wrote:
the "noinline" cases were built with Arjan's patch and
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE; the "inline" kernels were built,
obviously, without the patch and without CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.
Wait, so how do we know if its GCC's -Os that caused the reduction in .text
size, or the noinline patch ... ?
To get actual results, you should either take OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE out the equation
or use it on the other kernel as well...
--
[Name ] :: [Matan I. Peled ]
[Location ] :: [Israel ]
[Public Key] :: [0xD6F42CA5 ]
[Keyserver ] :: [keyserver.kjsl.com]
encrypted/signed plain text preferred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]