Re: Integer types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 11:55 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > * u8, u16, ...
> > > * uint8_t, uint16_t, ...
> > > * u_int8_t, t_int16_t, ...
> >
> > From the above list, the first ones. See
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/259313. Please note that
> > there's also __le32 and __be32 for variables that have fixed byte
> > ordering.

On 12/31/05, David Woodhouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> As ever, however, be aware that our esteemed leader is fickle.
> Especially when he's wrong, as he was on that occasion.

Maybe so but some maintainers do require them. So as for the original
question, I would still recommend the u8 ones as they are most likely
merged as is.

                                   Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux