Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

> Unification of active and inactive per cpu page lists is a requirement 
> for CLOCK-Pro, right?

You can approximate the functionality through use of scan
rates.  Not quite as accurate as a unified clock, though.

-- 
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
  - From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] vm: page-replace and clockpro
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
  - From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/9] clockpro-nonresident.patch
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]