Re: [RFC] Event counters [1/3]: Basic counter functionality

[Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>]

Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

> What about this addition to the documentation above, to make it a little more 
> verbose:
>
> 	The possible race scenario is restricted to kernel preemption,
> 	and could happen as follows:
>
> 	thread A				thread B
> a)	movl    xyz(%ebp), %eax			movl    xyz(%ebp), %eax
> b)	incl    %eax				incl    %eax
> c)	movl    %eax, xyz(%ebp)			movl    %eax, xyz(%ebp)
>
> Thread A can be preempted in b), and thread B succesfully increments the
> counter, writing it back to memory. Now thread A resumes execution, with
> its stale copy of the counter, and overwrites the current counter.
>
> Resulting in increments lost.
>
> However that should be relatively rare condition.

Hi Guys,

I've been waiting for some mm/ patches to clear from -mm before commenting
too much... however I see that this patch is actually against -mm itself,
with my __mod_page_state stuff in it... that makes the page state accounting
much lighter weight AND is not racy.

So I'm not exactly sure why such a patch as this is wanted now? Are there
any more xxx_page_state hotspots? (I admit to only looking at page faults,
page allocator, and page reclaim).

Thanks,
Nick

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/