Re: RAID controller safety

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, I finally tracked through the i2o code, and found that i2o_block_device_flush is ultimately
called for fsync.  Sorry for being so dense.

However, it does look like barriers are not directly supported.  So, are they safe to use in ext3,
or is ext3 all fine without them?  Would barriers benefit i2o devices, or is there some reason to
not have them?

As for the controller defaulting to write-back, I still cannot find anything that would set the
cache mode to write-through in the non-battery-backed case.

-Kenny



	
		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. 
http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux