Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



<snip>

> > Note that just looking at slabinfo is not enough for this - you need the
> > original
> > sizes as passed to kmalloc, not the rounded values reported there.
> > Should be probably not too hard to hack a simple monitoring script up
> > for that
> > in systemtap to generate the data.
> 
> Something like this:
> 
> http://lwn.net/Articles/124374/

Written with a systemtap script: 
http://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2005-q3/msg00550.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux