RAID controller safety

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,
  I am trying to determine which drivers and what hardware can be used to give reliable fsync
behavior.  I see many drivers with FIXME or TODO comments which make me nervous.
  I see the sd driver supports the direct SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE, but I'me having a hard time tracing
through how this translates to raid controllers and their drivers.
  Specificly, I am looking at the Adaptec RAID controllers and their i2o drivers.  I am told the
kernel's i2o driver lacks a strong guarantee on fsync, and so far am unable to determine if the
dpt_i2o driver also falls short in this reguard.

  I don't mean to start a 'drives lie - disable all caching, buy FC drives' flame war.  I know
drives can lie, but I'd like to know if the drivers are lying too.

thanks,
-Kenny



	
		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. 
http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux