Re: [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Below is a patch by Andi Kleen from kernel Bugzilla #5758 fixing a 
> post-2.6.14 regression.

WTF are you submitting my patches? Please don't do this - I am perfectly
capable to do this on my own when the time is ripe for them. For this
patch that's post 2.6.15 and after more testing.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

References:
- Ho ho ho.. Linux 2.6.15-rc7
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: PCI DMA burst delay
Next by Date: Re: X86_64 compile error (crash.c)
Previous by thread: [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory
Next by thread: Re: [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]