>>>>> "Arjan" == Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:
Arjan> On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 05:59 -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> + +#define xfs_mutex_init(lock, type, name) mutex_init(lock)
>> +#define xfs_mutex_lock(lock, type) mutex_lock(lock) +#define
>> mutex_destroy(lock) do{}while(0)
Arjan> why not just change all mutex_init users to only pass lock?
Arjan> (same for the others) eg why add another abstraction instead of
Arjan> fixing the caller?
I have no objections to this, however I am not sure if the XFS guys
try to maintain some level of source compatibility. Just trying to
play nicely, but I agree that would be cleaner.
Cheers,
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
