> IOW: I'd prefer that we be the ones who specify which functions are going > to be inlined and which ones are not. a bold statement... especially since the "and which ones are not" isn't currently there, we still leave gcc a lot of freedom there ... but only in one direction. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- References:
- [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Next by Date: [Announce] Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG 802.11b/g Access Point Project
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Index(es):
 |