Re: 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables

On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 22:59 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I wish you'd found it at -rc1 time.

Unfortunately this is the kind of thing that only could have been found
with Ingo's latency tracer, and the -rt patch set was not rebased to
2.6.15 until -rc5.

I'm not sure how much work it would be to break out CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE
as a separate patch.

Thanks for the patch, I'll try it.

Lee



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

References:
- 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables
  - From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: /sys/class/net/<device name>/wireless directory
Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables
Next by thread: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]