On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > > [snip] > > > > So it really does improve the latency here. Now is this worth the > > overhead? This might be useful in other places to. > > Any chance you can regenerate the patch against 2.6.15-rc5-rt4? > Sure, if I can find the damn thing. Too many kernels, and too many patch directories. -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.14-rt22 (and mainline): netstat -anop triggers excessive latencies
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: 2.6.14-rt22 (and mainline): netstat -anop triggers excessive latencies
- References:
- 2.6.14-rt22 (and mainline): netstat -anop triggers excessive latencies
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: 2.6.14-rt22 (and mainline): netstat -anop triggers excessive latencies
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
- Re: 2.6.14-rt22 (and mainline): netstat -anop triggers excessive latencies
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- 2.6.14-rt22 (and mainline): netstat -anop triggers excessive latencies
- Prev by Date: Re: recommended mail clients [was] [PATCH] ati-agp suspend/resume support (try 2)
- Next by Date: Re: recommended mail clients [was] [PATCH] ati-agp suspend/resume support (try 2)
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.14-rt22 (and mainline): netstat -anop triggers excessive latencies
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.14-rt22 (and mainline): netstat -anop triggers excessive latencies
- Index(es):
![]() |