On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:16:57 +0100
Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > +int rtc_set_alarm(struct class_device *class_dev, struct rtc_wkalrm*alrm)
> > >
> > > Struct rtc_wake_alarm *alarm, those wovels are there for readability.
> >
> > I'm not the one who created this structure. It's defined
> > in linux/rtc.h since a long time. I can only change alrm
> > to alarm.
>
> Sorry if you are not responsible... Yes, alarm would be better.
>
> How does this relate to /proc/acpi/alarm, btw? Do they use same RTC
> alarm?
Yes, they do. The ACPI subsystem does direct I/O on the cmos clock.
Given the complexity of the ACPI code, when/if the x86 rtc driver
will be ported to the RTC subsystem, it would be wise
to disable the alarm part if ACPI is compiled in.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
