Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib_inflate "r.base" uninitialized compile warnings

On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 12:35:32PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 12:08:00PM -0800, James Lamanna wrote:
> > What version of gcc are you using?
> 
> gcc (GCC) 4.0.3 20051201 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-5)
> 
> > Looks like a gcc bug that was fixed?
> 
> I guess it's been introduced.  ;)

4.0.x is very bad in that area - it's crying "wolf" a _lot_ and genuine
cases of uninitialized variables being used are drowning in the noise;
compared to 3.x it's a serious regression.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib_inflate "r.base" uninitialized compile warnings
  - From: James Lamanna <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib_inflate "r.base" uninitialized compile warnings
  - From: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib_inflate "r.base" uninitialized compile warnings
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib_inflate "r.base" uninitialized compile warnings
Next by thread: [PATCH] ati-agp suspend/resume support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]