Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator


Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>
> 
> [snip]
> 
>>
>> Agree, I couldn't see nothing better for a basement of generic dev.
>> alloc.
>>
>> So, it will be much better if it will be moved to lib/.
>>
>> Anyone have some more comments about subj. ?
>>
> 
> Sure, but the call has to be made be a core developer.
> 
> Andrew?

Pantelis, what did you think about renaming rheap.c and rh_xxx, to
something like dev_xxx, since, for example, rh_alloc overlapped with
__rh_alloc (__RegionHach__alloc) in the drivers/md/dm-raid1.c.


-- 
Regards
Andrey Volkov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
  - From: Andrey Volkov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
  - From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
  - From: Andrey Volkov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
  - From: Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
  - From: Andrey Volkov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
  - From: Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]