Re: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI: add set_clock() to bitbang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Brownell wrote:

No, suppose there're two devices behind the same SPI bus that have different clock constraints. As active SPI device change may well happen when each new message is processed, we'll need to set up clocks again for each message. Right?

Clock is coupled to chipselect/device.  When the bus controller
switches to the other device, it updates the clock accordingly.
Yeah, but chipselect is called on per-transfer basis what is likely to be redundant for clock setting.
Per-message clock configuration is enough AFAIS.

How exactly that's done is system-specific.  Many controllers
just have a register per chipselect, listing stuff like SPI mode,
clock divisor, and word size.  So switching to that chipselect
kicks those in automatically ... devices ignore the clock unless
they've been selected.
Hmm, usually clocks are configured for the bus not device.
So, summarizing, you haven't convinced me yet. :)

Vitaly
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux