RE: FW: Kernel oops v2.4.31 in e1000 network card driver.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, 23 December 2005 9:17 AM
> To: Tim Warnock
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: FW: Kernel oops v2.4.31 in e1000 network card driver.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 07:10:04PM +1000, Tim Warnock wrote:
> > Further information to this:
> > 
> > Network card causing the problem is the intel quad port 
> > gigabit ethernet pci card.
> > I have tested also on 2.4.27, 2.4.32 and the latest 2.6 
> > series kernel.
> > 
> > Under load (10-15kpps) the network driver crashes. Under 
> > increased load (20-30kpps) the driver will actually cause
> > a full kernel panic and reboot the box.
> 
> What type of system is it ? P3/P4/K7/K8 ? UP/SMP ? do you have a PCI-X
> bus in it ? have you checked /proc/interrupts for strange behaviours ?

IBM x306 p4 3.0ghz UP/HT (acpi=ht) 1gb ram 

It's a 64bit pci bus, the quad card is 64 bit also.

Underlying host os is debian sarge.

I never thought to check /proc/interrupts. I get the network card back
from remote soon, I will put it in a bench system and see what happens.
What should I be looking for in /proc/interrupts?

> > After replacing the card with a single port intel gigabit 
> ethernet pci card, the system has been rock stable.
> > 
> > According to intel, the quad port nic is based around the "Intel(r)
> > 82546EB" controller, the single port nic is based around 
> > the "Intel(r) 82545" controller.
> > 
> > Are there any other known problems with Intel(r) 82546EB controller
> > support with the current e1000 driver?
> 
> Not to my knowledge. I have several of them running on moderate volume
> (50 Mbps) on production up to 50-60 kpps, and they have never 
> ever caused any trouble after 2.5 years. I even use others in 
> stress-testing machines which throw up to 500 kpps per port without
> any problem either. BTW, the ones in the stress-testers are more
> recent, they are the ones with the "toundra" PCI bridge.
> 
> Do you encounter the problem in only one system ? I begin to suspect a
> hardware failure somewhere (CPU, RAM) which is triggered by 
> higher loads.
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux