On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 07:12:38PM +0100, Axel Kittenberger wrote: > > Have you timed this operation? I would predict that the time to copy > > the kernel is nominal as compared the the time taken to perform the > > decompression. > > In the current version it is defleated AND copied. The optimization would > reduce it by 1 copy. Right. And the time to perform that one copy is exactly...? I doubt that it is a significant percentage of the whole operation. > > Greetings, Axel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window)
- From: Folkert van Heusden <[email protected]>
- Re: Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window)
- From: "Axel Kittenberger" <[email protected]>
- Re: Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window)
- References:
- Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window)
- From: Axel Kittenberger <[email protected]>
- Re: Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window)
- From: Marc Singer <[email protected]>
- Re: Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window)
- From: "Axel Kittenberger" <[email protected]>
- Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window)
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 13/20] inflate: (arch) kill silly zlib typedefs
- Next by Date: [PATCH 9/20] inflate: (arch) refactor inflate malloc code
- Previous by thread: Re: Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window)
- Next by thread: Re: Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window)
- Index(es):
 |