Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla

Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> not a post-2.6.14 regression
>

Well yeah.  But that doesn't mean thse things have lower priority that
post-2.6.14 regressions.

I understand what you're doing here, but we should in general concentrate
upon the most severe bugs rather than upon the most recent..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
  - From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

References:
- Linux 2.6.15-rc6
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] msi vector targeting abstractions
Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/9] mutex subsystem, -V4
Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]