On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:33:21PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:04:22AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:41:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Yes, it's basically always wrong to include asm/foo.h when linux/foo.h
> > > exists.
> >
> > There's always an exception to every rule. linux/irq.h is that
> > exception for the above rule.
>
> Why?
/*
* Please do not include this file in generic code. There is currently
* no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held
* within this file.
*
* Thanks. --rmk
*/
Using linux/irq.h instead of asm/irq.h _breaks_ architectures
which do not use the generic irq code.
Basically, linux/irq.h should have been called asm-generic/irq.h.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
