Re: Question on the current behaviour of malloc () on Linux

On 12/21/05, Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> wrote:

> The final value of 2 means "Always overcommit" - In this mode the

This is a mistake ofcourse, I meant to say :

        The final value of 2 means "Don't overcommit"



--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Question on the current behaviour of malloc () on Linux
  - From: Jie Zhang <[email protected]>
- Re: Question on the current behaviour of malloc () on Linux
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Question on the current behaviour of malloc () on Linux
Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/8] mutex subsystem, ANNOUNCE
Previous by thread: Re: Question on the current behaviour of malloc () on Linux
Next by thread: Re: Question on the current behaviour of malloc () on Linux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]