Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] I/OAT DMA support and TCP acceleration

From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:20:43 +0100

> Please consider not enlarging cb[] if not CONFIG_NET_DMA ?

I also disagree with putting this thing in the cb[] at all.

Just put the dma_cookie_t explicitly into struct sk_buff,
protected by CONFIG_NET_DMA.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC][PATCH 4/5] I/OAT DMA support and TCP acceleration
  - From: Chris Leech <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] I/OAT DMA support and TCP acceleration
  - From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] I/OAT DMA support and TCP acceleration
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] I/OAT DMA support and TCP acceleration
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] I/OAT DMA support and TCP acceleration
Next by thread: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] I/OAT DMA support and TCP acceleration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]