Re: Light-weight dynamically extended stacks

[Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:40:06 EST, Patrick McLean said:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> > 
> > This is not intended to be an automatic scheme. To use it, you must
> > actually insert code into the troublesome codepaths, which will of
> > course serve as a red flag for code review.
> > 
> 
> It might be an idea to put in a #warn to make it an even bigger red 
> flag, and to really make people fix this rather than just ignore it 
> since it works with the dynamic stacks.

Stick a 'depends on CONFIG_BROKEN' on it? ;)

Attachment: pgpc9EGS9wLCo.pgp
Description: PGP signature