On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > > With modules it's possible to test a new ALSA version without > recompiling the kernel or even rebooting That's TOTALLY irrelevant. Kernel modules work fine for developers. I'm not saying that _you_ shouldn't use modules. I'm saying that you have absolutely no business telling others not to compile these things in. Statically compiled drivers have advantages. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Linux 2.6.15-rc6
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
- From: Sergey Vlasov <[email protected]>
- Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
- From: James Courtier-Dutton <[email protected]>
- Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Linux 2.6.15-rc6
- Prev by Date: [RFC: 2.6 patch] include/linux/irq.h: #include <linux/smp.h>
- Next by Date: [PATCH v2:1/3]Export cpu topology by sysfs
- Previous by thread: Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
- Next by thread: Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
- Index(es):
 |