On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> What other interest have you pulled up on this? I mean, have others
> shown interest in pushing something like this. Today's slab system is
> starting to become like the IDE where nobody, but a select few
> sado-masochis, dare to venture in. (I've CC'd them ;) Perhaps it would
> make the addition of NUMA easier.
Hmm. The basics of the SLAB allocator are rather simple.
I'd be interested in seeing an alternate approach. There is the danger
that you will end up end up with the same complexity as before.
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113510997009883&w=2
Quite a long list of unsupported features. These academic papers
usually only focus on one thing. The SLAB allocator has to work
for a variety of situations though.
It would help to explain what ultimately will be better in the new slab
allocator. The complexity could be taken care of by reorganizing the code.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
