* David Singleton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dinakar,
> after further testing and investigation I believe you original
> assessment was correct.
> The problem you are seeing is not a library problem.
> The changes to down_futex need to be reverted. There is a new patch at
>
> http://source.mvista.com/~dsingleton/patch-2.6.15-rc5-rt2-rf2.
>
> that reverts the changes to down_futex.
hm, i'm looking at -rf4 - these changes look fishy:
- _raw_spin_lock(&lock_owner(lock)->task->pi_lock);
+ if (current != lock_owner(lock)->task)
+ _raw_spin_lock(&lock_owner(lock)->task->pi_lock);
why is this done?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
