On Monday 19 December 2005 2:16 am, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> HI David,
>
> one of the guys working on the SPI stuff with me noticed that he didn't
> feel conmortable with spi_sync name as it could be confused with the
> function that synchronizes between something and something else. So what
> if change spi_sync/spi_async to spi_transfer_sync/spi_transfer_async?
Sure, feel free to submit a patch changing that the places they're used
in the 2.6.15-rc5-mm3 SPI patches. (Plus the four patches I've sent
since then...) The only downside to this change is breaking builds!
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
