Hi there! First the basic system specs: Athlon64 3500+ S939, Winchester Kernel 2.6.14.4, X86_64 4*1 GB RAM DDR 333, Dual Channel [before: 2*1 GB RAM DDR 400, Dual Channel] Intel Gigabit PCI (Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02)) Abit AV8 After upgrading the memory to 4 GB I noticed my e1000 did not work. dmesg shows: e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang TDH <2000> TDT <2000> next_to_use <6> next_to_clean <0> buffer_info[next_to_clean] dma <13024c002> time_stamp <ffffd8c7> next_to_watch <0> jiffies <ffffe096> next_to_watch.status <0> e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang TDH <2000> TDT <2000> next_to_use <6> next_to_clean <0> buffer_info[next_to_clean] dma <13024c002> time_stamp <ffffd8c7> next_to_watch <0> jiffies <ffffe28a> next_to_watch.status <0> eth0: no IPv6 routers present e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang TDH <2000> TDT <2000> next_to_use <6> next_to_clean <0> buffer_info[next_to_clean] dma <13024c002> time_stamp <ffffd8c7> next_to_watch <0> jiffies <ffffe47e> next_to_watch.status <0> e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang TDH <2000> TDT <2000> next_to_use <6> next_to_clean <0> buffer_info[next_to_clean] dma <13024c002> time_stamp <ffffd8c7> next_to_watch <0> jiffies <ffffe672> next_to_watch.status <0> ethtool -t eth0 offline: The test result is FAIL The test extra info: Register test (offline) 40 Eeprom test (offline) 0 Interrupt test (offline) 4 Loopback test (offline) 13 Link test (on/offline) 1 I have two of these cards. Both run fine in my (old, 32bit) server. I tested with both cards with both systems. Only in my 64bit machine this error occurs - with both cards. Please tell me what to do. I have to live with the VIA onboard in the meantime and that is not the best network card... Thanks a lot, -- Carsten Otto [email protected] www.c-otto.de
Attachment:
pgpd619vE0gGC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intel e1000 fails after RAM upgrade
- From: Jesse Brandeburg <[email protected]>
- Re: Intel e1000 fails after RAM upgrade
- From: Carsten Otto <[email protected]>
- Re: Intel e1000 fails after RAM upgrade
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15-rc6] block: Make CDROMEJECT more robust
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 0/5] Direct Migration V8: Overview
- Next by thread: Re: Intel e1000 fails after RAM upgrade
- Index(es):