On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 10:59 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > chipselect = !t->cs_change; > if (chipselect); > continue; > > bitbang->chipselect(spi, 0); > > /* REVISIT do we want the udelay here instead? > */ > msleep(1); Ohhh. Have you intentionally put the semicolon after "if (chipselect)" ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [spi-devel-general] Re: [PATCH/RFC] SPI: async message handing library update
- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- Re: [spi-devel-general] Re: [PATCH/RFC] SPI: async message handing library update
- References:
- [PATCH 2.6-git 0/4] SPI core refresh
- From: Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>
- [PATCH/RFC] SPI: add async message handing library to David Brownell's core
- From: Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>
- [PATCH/RFC] SPI: async message handing library update
- From: Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] SPI: async message handing library update
- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- [PATCH 2.6-git 0/4] SPI core refresh
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/12]: MUTEX: Implement mutexes
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC] SPI: async message handing library update
- Next by thread: Re: [spi-devel-general] Re: [PATCH/RFC] SPI: async message handing library update
- Index(es):
![]() |