Re: [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem

> Perhaps it's the smaller structures, as Ingo said, which would allow for
> better cache handling.

That still doesn't seem credible on a large cached x86 CPU.
However if it's that then oprofile could tell I guess.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 09/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, mutex-migration-helper-x86_64.patch
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 05/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, mutex-core.patch
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]