On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:36:29PM -0800, Robert Walsh wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 04:27 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Robert Walsh <[email protected]> writes:
> > >
> > > Any chance we could get these moved into the x86_64 arch directory,
> > > then? We have to do double-word copies, or our chip gets unhappy.
> >
> > Standard memcpy will do double word copies if everything is suitably
> > aligned. Just use that.
>
> This is dealing with buffers that may be passed in from user space, so
> there's no guarantee of alignment for either the start address or the
> length.
So how can you do double word access when the length is not a multiple of four?
The current x86-64 copy_from_user will use double work access even in that case,
except for the end of course.
But what you're doing is so deeply unportable it's not funny. I am not
sure such a unportable driver even belongs in the kernel.
If the code was really intended to run on user space addresses it
was totally broken btw because it didn't handle exceptions.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]