Re: [PATCH 01/13] [RFC] ipath basic headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Do we really need this ugly userspace emulation code in the kernel?

Probably not.  I'll look into removing it.

> What is this used for? Why can't yo use memcpy?

Our chip can only handle double-word copies.

> > +#define round_up(v,sz) (((v) + (sz)-1) & ~((sz)-1))
> 
> Please use ALIGN().

Fair enough.

> You seem to be introducing loads of new ioctls. Any reason you can't
> use sysfs and/or configfs?

I'll see what people here think of that idea.

> > +#define ips_get_ipath_ver(ipath_header) (((ipath_header) >> INFINIPATH_I_VERS_SHIFT) \
> > +        & INFINIPATH_I_VERS_MASK)
> 
> Please use static inlines instead for readability.

OK.

Regards,
 Robert.

-- 
Robert Walsh                                 Email: [email protected]
PathScale, Inc.                              Phone: +1 650 934 8117
2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200                 Fax: +1 650 428 1969
Mountain View, CA 94043.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux